About The Paxton Record
Our Mission
The Paxton Record exists to provide a single, organized, source-backed resource documenting the legal, ethical, and political controversies of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. While individual news outlets have covered these stories extensively, no single resource previously compiled the full scope of Paxton's record in one place with primary source links. This site fills that gap.
We believe that public officials — especially the state's top law enforcement officer — should be held accountable through transparency and access to information. The Paxton Record is not affiliated with any political party, campaign, or advocacy organization. It is an independent public records archive.
Our Methodology
Every factual claim on this site is sourced to one or more of the following:
- Court filings and official court records
- Government documents (legislative records, agency filings, official proceedings)
- Established news organizations with editorial standards (Texas Tribune, Houston Chronicle, Associated Press, ProPublica, Texas Monthly, San Antonio Express-News, KXAN, and others)
Where primary source documents are available, we link directly to them. Where claims are based on reporting, we link to the original news source. Allegations are clearly identified as allegations. Opinions are clearly labeled as editorial commentary. We distinguish between established facts, allegations, and analysis.
Correction Policy
Accuracy is the foundation of this project. We take errors seriously. If you believe any claim on this site is inaccurate, we want to hear from you.
To submit a correction, email us at editor@thepaxtonrecord.com with:
- The specific page and claim you believe is inaccurate
- Documentation or sources supporting your correction
- Your contact information for follow-up (optional but helpful)
We review all correction requests promptly. If an error is confirmed, we will correct it, note the correction with the date, and update the relevant source citations. We do not silently edit — all corrections are documented.
Published Corrections
September 29, 2026 — Date and nature of the State Securities Board action. The Timeline, Securities Fraud, Finances, and Documents pages dated Paxton's reprimand by the Texas State Securities Board to 2012. The disciplinary order was issued on May 2, 2014; 2012 is when the conduct it covered took place. The Timeline also labeled the entry "Criminal"; the order was a civil, administrative sanction and is now labeled "Ethics." All four pages have been corrected, and the Timeline now lists the 2012 conduct and the 2014 order as separate entries.
September 29, 2026 — What the third felony count concerned. The Securities Fraud page said all three 2015 felony counts related to Paxton's Servergy activities. Only the two first-degree fraud counts did. The third-degree count, for failing to register, concerned his solicitation of clients for Mowery Capital Management — the same conduct he accepted a State Securities Board reprimand and $1,000 fine for in 2014, and which contemporaneous reporting described as admitted. The page, the Timeline, the Finances page, and the homepage now say so. This correction was prompted by a reader letter. (The letter described the charges as federal; they were state charges brought by a Collin County grand jury.)
September 29, 2026 — Dismissal date on the Finances page. The Finances page said the securities fraud charges were dismissed in 2024. Paxton entered the pretrial diversion agreement in 2024; the charges were dismissed on June 18, 2025. Corrected.
September 29, 2026 — Federal investigation status, second instance. Our August 16 correction updated the body of the Whistleblowers page to reflect that the Justice Department closed its investigation without charges, but a summary box on the same page still said Paxton "remains under federal investigation." That line has been corrected.
August 16, 2026 — Whistleblower judgment payment status. The Whistleblowers page previously stated that the four whistleblowers had received their $6.6 million court-ordered payment, and the homepage stated the judgment "is paid entirely by Texas taxpayers." We could not verify that the judgment has been paid. The award is final and unappealed, but it requires an appropriation by the Texas Legislature, and we found no public confirmation that the funds have been appropriated or disbursed. Both pages now describe the judgment as final but not confirmed paid. We regret the error.
August 16, 2026 — Status of the federal investigation. The Whistleblowers page stated that the FBI investigation the whistleblowers triggered was "reportedly ongoing." That was out of date and contradicted our own reporting elsewhere on this site: the Department of Justice declined to bring charges in the final weeks of the Biden administration, closing the roughly four-year investigation. The page has been corrected.
Write to the Editor
The Paxton Record is maintained by an independent editorial team committed to factual, sourced documentation of Ken Paxton's public record. We are not affiliated with any political party, campaign, PAC, or government entity.
We welcome correspondence from readers, journalists, researchers, and members of the public. Whether you have a question, a tip, a correction, or simply want to share your perspective — we read every message.
editor@thepaxtonrecord.comCorrections
Found a factual error? Send us the specific claim and your supporting documentation. We take accuracy seriously and will respond promptly.
Tips & Documents
Have primary source documents, court filings, or information relevant to Paxton's record? We review all submissions for potential inclusion.
Press & Media
Journalists and media organizations seeking information about this project, requesting interviews, or pursuing related stories are welcome to reach out.
General Questions
Questions about the site, our methodology, or how we source our reporting? We're happy to explain our process and editorial standards.
Legal Notice
This site is protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It is a public records archive and political commentary site focused on the documented record of a public official.
This site is not affiliated with Ken Paxton, the Office of the Texas Attorney General, any political campaign, political party, or any government entity. The operators of this site have no relationship with any of the parties mentioned.
All information is sourced from publicly available court filings, government records, and established news organizations. No confidential or non-public information is published on this site.
Under Texas law and federal law, public officials have a reduced expectation of privacy regarding their official conduct. Statements of fact about public officials are protected when true or substantially true. Statements of opinion are clearly identified and are protected under the First Amendment.
Sources We Rely On
A list of the primary news organizations and official sources cited throughout the site:
- Texas Tribune — texastribune.org
- Houston Chronicle — houstonchronicle.com
- Associated Press
- ProPublica — propublica.org
- Texas Monthly — texasmonthly.com
- San Antonio Express-News
- KXAN
- Texas Legislature Online — capitol.texas.gov
- Supreme Court of the United States — supremecourt.gov
- Texas State Securities Board